> > Your question, as given unambiguously in the subject line, relates to > 2.6.0. I'm telling you, equally unambiguously, that you don't > want to do > that. You might need to start off with an older binary to get > yourself > going, or you might be able to get hold of a binary for 2.6.0, but > having done that, in the case of SPARC, you want to get onto 2.7.1 > rather than relying on 2.6.0's correctness. > > > I have no particular need for 2.6.0, I just normally try to get the > > stable release of whatever new thing I decide to try out and I > > understood from the website 2.6.0 is the one I should use. > > You are, of course, free to ignore my advice. >
In any case, 2.6.0 is needed now to build 2.7.1. Just rebuild 2.7.1 from today on Solaris 10 Intel and it failed miserably with 2.4.4. That worked a few months ago and the 2.7.1 then build doesn't build todays 2.7.1 neither. Only 2.6.0 builds 2.7.1 correctly. But I fully agree: don't do more on Solaris with 2.6.0 than building 2.7.1. Ludo _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
