Am 29.04.2012 12:13, schrieb ik:
> Let's take simple program:
>
> ---- pascal code ----
>
> program hello;
>
> begin
> writeln('Hello World');
> end.
>
> ----- pascal code ----
>
> vs c code:
>
> ------ c code -----
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
> printf("Hello World\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> ------ c code ------
>
> The code executable will be not only smaller, but takes less memory to
> run,
How did you measure this? Did you take the dyn. libs into account or did
you link statically? For me, the FPC executable is much smaller, gcc
-static creates something with 500 kB, and 1000 runs of the FPC version
take 20 per cent less time than the C one?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
