On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Jürgen Hestermann <juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de> wrote: > Fully agree. Especially, because ex Delphi (and ex Turbo Pascal) users would > expect it like that. And most of them (coming from Delphi/TP) believe that > the randomness is not very reliable. They mainly don't even know (like me) > that the FPC random() is much more sophisticated.
Based on what they expect that? For sure not based on reading the Delphi documentation about Random: http://docs.embarcadero.com/products/rad_studio/delphiAndcpp2009/HelpUpdate2/EN/html/delphivclwin32/System_Random.html There is no mention of it being fast and also not about it being weak statistically, so those are undocumented behavior. But it is written: "Note: Because the implementation of the Random function may change between compiler versions, we do not recommend using Random for encryption or other purposes that require reproducible sequences of pseudo-random numbers." So are we supporting usage of Random in Delphi which depends on implementation details even while the documentation never said they were guaranteed but instead explicitly says it can change? And what if it changes in the future to being slow and statistically strong, we change again too? And what about people using FPC only and depending on our Random being statistically strong, they are less important then theorical Delphi migrants? -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
