On 2011-10-19 13:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: > factor 6 when switching from XML to binary messaging. Not using HTTP but a > self-made TCP/IP protocol gets you another factor.
Are both the binary message format and self-made TCP/IP protocol publicly available? Maybe that might be worth implementing in tiOPF too, as an optional setting to improve the remote persistence layer performance. > Yes it is. > It's much less verbose also, which means the transported packets > are much smaller. Excellent, I'll try and add JSON support to tiOPF too. A quick look on the web at the JSON syntax, it does indeed looks much more human readable and "simpler" than XML. I'm not a big fan of XML at all. > If you do, then I'd be very interested in hearing about your progress. I'll keep you informed. I'll probably start on this early next week. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
