On 25/04/2011 08:58, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Paulo Costa said:
I saw that h2pas translated:
typedef void(*callback)(int pos, void* userdata);
to
callback = procedure (pos:cint; var userdata:pointer);cdecl;
userdata is essentially untyped, so it doesn't matter what it exactly points
too.
Right. The trouble here was that I see var foo as a reference to foo,
which means an implicit pointer. So var userdata:pointer is like a
pointer to pointer and that doesn't look like the original C code...
shouldn't it be?
callback = procedure (pos:cint; userdata:pointer);cdecl;
It is a better translation, and also pointer style support NIL. Do you use
-v or not?
OK. I did not use the -v option so I was wondering why it was selecting
the first option.
Paulo Costa
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
