On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Sven Barth wrote:
It is correct that the second doesn't compile. To make the second
compile, the overloaded operators for the complex type must be defined
inside complex (which was/is? not possible).
It should be possible now, I didn't test it though yet.
The question is: should we really restrict the overloads to operators defined
inside those structures only? What if the user wants to use a class instead
of a record? Or an object? And what if the operators are only defined global
like the Variant ones...
Exactly the point I was trying to make.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
