Hello FPC-Pascal, Saturday, March 5, 2011, 12:24:24 PM, you wrote:
>> it fails with a sigsegv. Are both expected to have the same behavior >> in this case ? (pointer to record). JM> "constref" is basically the same as "var" as far as passing JM> the parameter is concerned. That means that in the case above, you JM> are passing a pointer to a pointer to a record. If you just want a JM> pointer to a record, use this: Ok, that's 100% clear. I'm passing a pointer to a record based in the XPIDL description and sometimes is quite difficult to interpret how a parameter should be defined based in the IDL description as it is quite C centric instead platform agnostic. When no modifier is applied (var, const,...) the behavior is deterministic or can change from platform to platform, or by ABI ? -- Best regards, José _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
