On 25/02/2011 11:43, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 25 Feb 2011, at 11:45, Ben wrote: > >> Op 2011-02-25 12:31, Jonas Maebe het geskryf: >>> >>> It seems that it's licensed under Artistic License 1.0 >>> (<http://powtils.googlecode.com/svn/dev/LICENSE%20(powtils).txt>), >> >> nYume is not part of powtils. The nYume code I have shows the following >> license. It doesn't mention the exactly licences name like GPL, MPL etc... > > It seems like a copy/paste of a part of the GPLv2.
With an infusion of BSD+adv... which renders it GPL incompatible... Looks like the license author tried to achieve best of both baskets; But effectively probably fenced himself from both... > Putting GPL code into FPC's packages is not that good either, since it > prevents usage in closed source programs. > > > Jonas L. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
