On 16 February 2011 16:51, leledumbo <leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id> wrote:
> > Yeah, he let Pascal in the last state he worked on. But don't you know he's > also an actor behind (Apple's) Object Pascal? > -- > View this message in context: > http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Name-of-the-programming-language-used-in-with-FPC-tp3375543p3387995.html > Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > How about Dijkstra? This will focus minds our wonderfully and will lead us to ensure that our programs are derived correctly from precise unambiguous semantically sound specifications. . I mean, we can't call our language Dijkstra and write buggy programs, can we? We should consider it a challenge. Let the voting begin!! -- Frank Church ======================= http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
