faber wrote:
If I were you I would print it with more digits so you see if there is any
significant difference at all.
ok I understand, I was suggested by
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/sin.html where it is
given score 0.0 for Writeln (Sin(Pi):0:1);
Transcendentals are a can of worms. Without and with formatting
respectively,
ARM, PowerPC, SPARC:
1.22464706384516E-016
0.0
x86 (P-III):
-5.4210108624275222E-0020
-0.0
All FPC 2.4.2 on Linux. The result /should/ be zero, and x86- which I
presume is what you're running- is nearer zero than the others :-)
There are lots of issues here, including the number of bits used
internally by the floating point hardware and whether it knows Pi to
this degree of precision. Also it might depend on optimisation level etc.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
