On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Dimitri Smits wrote:
Hi,
what is so different on this mail than the one I sent a few months ago to the
fpc-devel list?
anyway, it would require some packages (bpl) language/RTE additions as well.
Would you care to explain why you think so ?
The 2 features have nothing to do with each other whatsoever.
You can perfectly add extended RTTI to FPC without package support.
It may be that package support (if/whenever it appears) may need to take into
account
RTTI, but certainly not the other way round.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
