>> Then, it is awesome, is not it? As for me, WM and its API was quite >> comprehensible and convenient to develope applications in my favourite >> Pascal. There was large number of devices running under WM. Fotunately, there >> is a lot of ones so far.
> Sorry, but what do think is awesome? That you can only write .NET > applications for Windows Phone 7? That's what I call terrible (which is > basically the contrary of "awesome"). Of course, I meant that it's terrible and horrible, for I like WM and FreePascal. >> Maybe in the near future it will be worth to tend to the upcoming Bada >> platform >> of Samsung which allows to develope in C++? :) > Operating systems which provide a C++ API are always harder to interface > with e.g. Free Pascal than C based ones, because you need to flatten the > interface. See e.g. QT where you need to use an additional library which > flattens the C++ based API to a C based one. I still do not know much of the bada architecture, but I am not really sure that bada support is easy to add to FPC (if you are speaking of the bada port). I only meant that I can use bada IDE to code in C/C++. I am not very fond of Java and .Net. -- Best regards, Fantomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
