On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho < felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sven, although I understand what you're talking about, I think this is a > > case when MS partially learned from their own mistakes as well as from > > google success. > > No, it has nothing to do with it. > They really are just evil, unethical and not worth a single drop of trust. > .. > Of all other factors which make Palm obsolete you picked up a small > technical detail which the users couldn't care less about. > ... > This problem is non-existant. In the worse case you have one download > per architecture. > ... > Ok, Felipe, you're very convincing, besides, it's hard to be a devil's advocate in a world with real working "write once, compile everywhere" mantra :). Max
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
