On 18 Jul 2010, at 13:14, Žilvinas Ledas wrote: > I want to use it this way: > 1) Gel all @unitname.function addresses. > 2) Use disassembler to find nearest next RET. > 3) Then I assume that I have start and end of the function in the binary file. > > It works at least for the concept-showing app with some functions and enabled > optimizations when compiling. Do I have some conceptual flaw?
Yes: there is no guarantee that a function will contain only one "ret" (it is that way currently for compiler-generated code, but that can change at any time). Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
