On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Brunner <andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well... I think CGI gateway is a good way. If the real app (FCGI) have >> troubles, I can change the URL that the CGI (gateway) uses to call the >> real app and to point to another app (in other server, e.g.). What do >> you think about it? > > I think it would be worth discussing what can be done or at least > start thinking about getting the memory manager not to blow-out any > more. I really don't want to re-start server software just because a > few apps (embedded in the service application) crash. > > Has anyone with experience with developing the memory manager been > following? What about a separate discussion on application > stabilization after an unhanded exception? That would be a necessity > for at least my platform which is compiled with FPC - and certainly > FCLWeb generated back-end apps too.
I think is a good idea. Do you uses FastCGI? MD. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
