On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Reimar Grabowski <reimg...@web.de> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:05:36 -0300 > Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote: > >> We talk about just *functions* or we talk about *methods* too? > It is meant for 'method functions', too. But I don't follow that rule > strictly and > try to use a descriptive name that indicates that a function effects > something outside its scope.
Like obj1.CreateObj() ? =) >> I agree with you, but in part... If a *function* should only return a >> value then, what do a *procedure*? What are the good pratice for >> procedures? > Good naming and do what you like. :) Okay... thanks... ;-) Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
