On Wed, 05 May 2010 07:34:41 +0200 Jürgen Hestermann <juergen.hesterm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Say that it is a pointer to an array (and do not let the user think it is "an > array"!). And say that although it is a pointer you still cannot derefference > it but you need to use the first index to get the beginning of the array. I agree that if it is said to be "a pointer to an array", dereferencing should eg allow copying the array globally (to another variable of the same kind, also dereferenced: "a2^:=a1^"). Which indeed is wrong. But i cannot find this the the fpc ref. On another point, maybe because I have a rather shallow C culture, I'm not tempted to use array variables as pointers to element #0, nore to do direct computations on their actual integer values. The [] syntax is here to provide all what I need. (Maybe that's only me.) Denis ________________________________ vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
