Lee Jenkins <l...@datatrakpos.com> wrote: > I don't think so because the framework itself doesn't incorporate any > communication protocols. Using your favorite existing Server platform (like > fpWeb/LazWeb) you write a small method for when a request comes in like the > one below to handle the request/response: > (...)
OK Lee, I will wait a public release, thanks. Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not 100% sure what you mean. Maybe "is it alive?" If so, yes tiOPF is > still actively being used and developed. A new branch was started > recently to work on tiOPF3 features which will include Unicode support > (but FPC is lagging behind Delphi on that one now). > > tiOPF2 is very stable for many years already - hence the reason there > are less commits than say 5 years ago, but that is just a sign that > framework+applications are working well, not that tiOPF is dead. Sorry my bad english :( but you get: "is it alive?" Thanks for the information about tiOPF! Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
