In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: > > > > No, it uses fcl-passrc. > > Perfect, thanks. Now my next question is, how up-to-date is the parser > [compared to the FPC parser]? Looking at the repository history for > the fcl-passrc directory, it looks like things are being updated. > February had a large update from Mattias.
It roughly works, but there are problematic constructs. IIRC it doesn't support some of the deprecated options. > > A third, more limited parser exists inside ptop and other highlighting and > > source beautifying tools. > > I would prefer to use something included with FPC - that at least > promotes the idea that it will stay updated as new language features > get added to FPC. The rest was mentioned to be complete. I think fcl-passrc is the most sane choice by far, both the parser, and because it is set up as a library. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
