Dariusz Mazur wrote:
with hack with trivial operator we receive the same:
for CollectionElement in Collection.CollectionEnumerator do
yes, but it is still the hack
but what about
for CollectionElement in Collection using TreeEnumerator do
where TreeEnumerator cant traverse thought Collection
Well, TreeEnumerator must be a method of Collection instance to do this
of course. If it exists then it is used.
But I have another proposition. Because we add so many variants to
forin construction, can be added once more.
[example]
for list do ....
[/example]
where we omit in keywords and iteration variable
If we ommit the 'in' keywork then it is not a 'for-in' loop, so I am not
responsible :)
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
