Jonas Maebe schrieb: > ik wrote on Fri, 23 Oct 2009: > >> You can use bitpacked records: >> >> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=bitpacked+record+package%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fpasxlibbind >> >> \.googlecode\.com&sbtn=Search >> >> Here is an example on how I use it :) > > No, you cannot use bitpacked records for C header translations. > Bitpacked records are not guaranteed to have the same layout as in C (or > even in different versions of FPC). If it works, you are lucky, and it > will probably fail on some other platform or in another FPC version one > day. > > The internal format of bitpacked records is opaque, and it is impossible > to express the alignment requirements of C bitpacked structs or their > internal fields with them.
In general yes, but I still use it for simple cases which cover 95% of the usage :) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
