Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl>: > And the criticism about introducing Cisms in FPC/Delphi is also old. In > the past I would have joined you, but after a few non-trivial header > conversions and library conversions that pretty much died out.
Yes. But that's not the fault of the C-language. That's the fault of sloppy C-programmers. Keywords like "const" to express intent exist for more than 10 years now. > Likewise you also get > tired when you need to update some header (or code like zlib,jpeg) and > have to guess what the purpose and consequences of some pascallization > are. That simply means, the code is not documented. Again: Not entirely C's fault. Vinzent. -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
