In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: > Out of those 3 seems to have logical names. rtl, fcl and fpdoc. The > problem I have is the 'user', 'ref' and 'prog' names. Maybe somebody > can explain to me how I can remember the various information in each of > these. For example, if I want to know about a Compiler Parameter, or a > Language syntax, it is never clear which document I should open. > > Now seeing that all (half-descent) OSes support long filenames these > days, couldn't we name them better.
The names would then be out of sync with the forms of documentation supported on apparantly less than half-decent OSes. (like CHM) Moreover I don't have a problem with the names themselves. One could wonder about the division of the three, but the association of "ref" with "reference guide", prog with "programmers's guide" etc isn't THAT hard. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
