On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:55:10 +0200 Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be> wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2009, at 18:48, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:46:21 +0200 > > Mattias Gärtner <nc-gaert...@netcologne.de> wrote: > > > >> [...] > >> I would say, that using cthreads under Linux in an LCL app is ok. > >> I didn't test yet a LCL app under OS X, *BSD or Sparc, so don't > >> know if cthreads has a performance penalty there. > > > > I did some tests on OS X and got some interesting results: > > > > An LCL application without cthreads: 15 seconds > > An LCL application with cthreads: 13 seconds > > An LCL application with cmem: 13 seconds > > > > This means LCL apps get faster with cthreads, while command line > > programs get slower. > > Without saying what this command line application and this LCL > application do exactly, it's kind of hard to understand this > conclusion. I already posted the code, so I guess you mean the libraries. How can I find out under OS X? Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
