In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > No, the thread manager is only for internal use by the RTL, and may lack > > implementations for functions not required by the RTL for a particular > > platform. See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=11206 > > That was definitely not the original intention of the thread manager. > > The idea was to have low-level thread related functions available without > classes, including semaphores.
I cannot remember that either. I can remember something about beginthread/endthread being kept because of backwards compat, but not because of a great all-procedural api. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
