Hello Jonas, Sunday, April 5, 2009, 5:27:02 PM, you wrote:
>> Something like this could kill the dead code detection ? A simple >> yes/no is enoght :) JM> Not in case of whole-program optimization: JM> --- dead.sorg 2009-04-05 17:24:25.000000000 +0200 JM> +++ dead.s 2009-04-05 17:24:32.000000000 +0200 JM> @@ -91,10 +91,7 @@ JM> # [29] TDerivedFoo(MyObj).Myprocedure(); JM> movl L_U_P$PROGRAM_MYOBJ$non_lazy_ptr-Lj2(%ebx),%eax JM> movl (%eax),%eax JM> - movl L_U_P$PROGRAM_MYOBJ$non_lazy_ptr-Lj2(%ebx),%edx JM> - movl (%edx),%edx JM> - movl (%edx),%edx JM> - call *80(%edx) JM> + call L_P$PROGRAM_TDEDERIVEDFOO_$__MYPROCEDURE$stub JM> I'm not sure about -dvtentry. Nice to see that, that's for sure a non easy objetive :) -- Best regards, JoshyFun _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
