In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > P.s. Speaking about docs: I saw the current documentation is still badly > > linked. > > (the next/prev links) I also retried myself using the most recent tex4ht > > updates (januari 2009), and failed again, the links are still borked, though > > i have a feeling they are slightly better. > > I'm happy that you think they are better :-) > > But as far as I'm concerned, this is a non-issue. > The HTML version of the docs is still only a courtesy.
I don't agree that the fact that HTML docs is secondary makes it automatically a non-issue :-) A "lesser" issue of course, but OTOH we have been messing with it for over ten years (I started with Latex2html 96) now, and it is still borked. I'm thinking of trying to create an html fixer app. I know, that wouldn't be the first too, but at least it would be better than this. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
