> Are you sure? Yes, I am.
> doesn't older MacOS's versions where written in Object Pascal? Yes, it does, but as I said I think it wasn't the better options. > I think the problem here (again) is not the language, it's the critical mass > of users of the language. Using C for Linux was a good bet, not because the > language is good (Pascal is way better for me), but because C has a wider > user base who can fix/add features. I disagree. C is better for write operating systems *by definition*: C was created to write UNIX, Pascal was created to learn good programming techniques. C is low/mid-level language, Pascal is high-level (and Object Pascal is even higher): OS are the lowest software level. I'm not saying it's impossible: here you have MacOS and Toro. I'm just saying that _I think_ it isn't the best option. Of course a better option is to write the kernel in C and Assembler and the utilities in Pascal and Object Pascal. Guillermo "Ñuño" Martínez _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
