On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ingemar Ragnemalm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is an argument only after considering the time versus the goal. Is the > goal worth the time? > No, and that was exactly my point. Life is too short to spend it rewriting Linux in Pascal. <g>
> > Another goal is to make a better OS. FPC programs use less memory and starts > faster. That can be a good thing. Would it be significant? I'm not sure. > Then maybe it would better to focus on something different from Linux. > You are perfectly right in that we must choose our battles and spend our > time on things that are worth the time. I don't rule out that this could be > one. "Porting Linux" doesn't have to imply that every little program is > ported. > Not every little program, but only for the kernel + drivers + filesystems the task is daunting. Gerard. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal