On 15/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- 8< -- > As far as I can judge: > They count on us to play things fair, and let us handle it to our > own judgement for the moment, but said that if we undertook no > action, they would take the necessary steps to protect their IP. > We have given them the initial result of our review (i.e. the list > of suspicious routines), and I haven't heard from them since. > As soon as we merge the clean-room implementation to the main > branch, I will inform them that this has been done. >
thanks for your explanation, i was curious what the progress on this was. are there similar infringements in the lcl that needs to be replaced, or has this not been reviewed? > Michael. henry _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
