On 08/01/2008, ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First create HTML 3.2 complaint.. it's easier then HTML 4(.1). > Then continue to HTML 4.1 :) The TV Pro have HTML 3.2 support...
Easier is always better. :) What is TV Pro? Google gave me a variety of results. > > There is a DOM. Please note that Om XHTML, the idea is that you have > the actual data as HTML (or XML) and the part of how to display it (as > CSS). Ah, I see there is a DOM unit in FPC I could use. > Also separate between the rendering and the parsing ! They are two > different things. > > And last, make it library (and API) based as one feature, so we will > have a parsing and rendering engines to offer other languages, that > will might create a community all around this project (at some point > :)) Yes, that is what I had in mind. The rendering engine could then be implemented by other toolkits like fpGUI, LCL, MSEgui etc... Thanks for the quick feedback Ido. I understand what you mean. Try and think small. A full blown HTML/RichText viewer is a huge project. Break it down into small pieces that in the end work together. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
