On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 17:25:16 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I don't see how CHM is better than PDF. PDF offers all that CHM > offers, plus well-formatted printed output. In my case, I have the impression that CHM is much lighter than PDF (which is logical considering much simplified graphical formatting). Also I like that the characters are in a set that I choose. And normally, I try to resist printing docs anyway. John _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
