As I mentioned before, assuming some degree of liability for your work is on the horizon.
From http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/10/house-of-lords-inquiry-personal-internet-security/ Quote: "The third area, and this is where the committee has been most far-sighted, and therefore in the short term this may well be their most controversial recommendation, is that they wish to see a software liability regime, viz: that software companies should become responsible for their security failures.... "...in practice it may be a decade or two before there's sufficient case law for vendors to know quite where they stand if they ship a product with a buffer overflow, or a race condition, or just a default password." This will be a major opportunity to be exploited by a vendor who can design apps which show due diligence via Contract Programming. James _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
