On 5/21/07, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
creating other suites and building the tree. So your unit is very handy for this and spares some typing.
Yeah, I have now grouped the tiOPF tests into the following suites. Non-Persistent Tests and then one testsuite per registered persistant layer (like CSV, TAB, Oracle, Firebird, etc). I've done the same for our commercial apps. Splitting the Non-Persistent tests from the Persistant (DB tests). This allows me to run the Non-Persistent suite all at once without having to pull in the slower running DB tests.
Yes, if it wasn't for your huge test suite, FPCUnit would not have been improved. The first time I've heard from you, some two years ago I didn't even believe it could handle such a suite gracefully.
Wow, that long ago.... Time flies when you are having fun. :-)
There is still many improvements that can be made, but my spare time is quite scarce lately. I'm waiting for my vacations :)
Yeah, I have a few more improvements on my list as well... All in due time.
Only when I wrote myself the framework in pascal, following the java code, I was able to understand it completely (and still I'm convinced
I was actually thinking of doing this as an example of Test Driven Development. Writing a new testing framework in Object Pascal, not as a replacement of FPCUnit, but to following the book of Kent Beck. I've done the money example a million times... :-) -- Graeme Geldenhuys General error, hit any user to continue. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
