On 5/19/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
utf8 seems appropriate, or utf if more than one encoding is supported.
I think that having a generic name is better, even if at first we only add utf-8 functions, because when we need more functions for other encodings we would need to create another unit, or rename this one, and that's unnecessary work -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
