On 15 May 07, at 19:47, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > I definitely need more detailed information. I can find binutils-2.17 but > > there's nothing wince specific about what I found. I suspect FPC 2.1 is > > necessary because it was needed for the arm-wince case however I don't > > understand how to take the source code snapshots available and compile > > them. Any additional details would be appreciated. > > You need to compile the source in such a way that makes them generate > i386-wince binaries. These are so called "cross" binaries (that generate > binaries for target i386-wince while being hosted on another). > > This is generally a fairly easy process on *nix, and a horrible, > hair-pulling one on Windows. (which is why we provide a set that we were > lucky to create after sacrificing several chickens to various MinGW gods > with some associated Voodoo) > > However in this case, it is worse. i386-wince is not support by my 2.17 > binutils. > > It might help to consult your HW vendor if he knows a patched src somewhere. > (or better, ready built cross bins (your target)->i386-wince.
Getting the internal linker to work for i386- wince maybe wouldn't require major effort (considering the fact that arm-wince target is currently supported if I remember correctly) - Yury? Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
