Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 09:51 +0200 schrieb Tiziano_mk: > for mark: > I am not a Linux user, sorry. All that seems too complex to me, but I'll > try to investigate :-)
What I wrote is pretty easy, I wish Windows has something like this in the base system - ever had a missing .DLL and windows won't tell you it's name? The last mail showed you how to ask "is libsndfile there?" and maybe "what version does it have?" depending on th naming conventions of your distribution. Today I can tell you how to answer the question "does the installed lib really not have function 'sf_open_read'?": $nm -D /usr/local/libsndfile.so | grep sf_open_read $ Hm, no output, funny. $ nm -D /usr/local/libsndfile.so | grep sf_open 0000c570 T psf_open_rsrc 00003e44 T sf_open 00003fb0 T sf_open_fd Ah, see: this version of the lib only has a bunch of other opening functions, not based on a filename but on a file descriptor or similar. Only guessing here, but: To support older lib version you can use that function instead of the apparently newer one taking a name or tell people to use at least the version you have installed. Your package manager (rpm, apt, ...) should be able to tell you the version number. After having had a look into the header file /usr/local/include/sndfile.h it is pretty clear ... HTH anyways, Marc _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
