On 4/5/07, Vinzent Hoefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And it would mean writing a C to Pascal conversion of an ever changing kernel interface.
All interfaces change when a new version is released, that´s no reason not to write pascal bindings for them. We have different pascal bindings for Qt 2, 3 and 4, for example. What really doesn´t help is that the windows driver world is huge. really vast. There are dozens of different driver types, and some tipes only work on some versions of windows.
> For Windows, > there is the additional problem of producing a .sys file, which would > mean some changes to the internal linker.
Another (maybe easier) option is to use the microsoft assembler and linker that come with the ddk. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
