On 27 Jul 06, at 19:01, Andreas Berger wrote: > Tomas Hajny wrote: > > No wonder. ;-) When using "make all", the new > > (2.1.1) compiler is compiled using the starting > > compiler (2.0.x). "Make cycle" tries to make sure > > that the created compiler is still useable, at > > least that useable that it can still build > > itself. It does so by doing the same thing in a > > cycle: > > > > 1) RTL and compiler (ppc1.exe) are compiled using > > the starting compiler. > > > > 2) Everything except ppc1.exe is cleaned, RTL and > > compiler (ppc2.exe) are compiled using ppc1.exe. > > > > 3) Everything except ppc2.exe is cleaned, RTL and > > compiler (ppc3.exe) are compiled using ppc2.exe. > > > > 4) ppc2.exe and ppc3.exe are compared - they > > should be equal. If they are the same, ppc3.exe > > is renamed to ppc386.exe. > > > > 5) If you build more than just the compiler (e.g. > > snapshot or release - i.e. this last step isn't > > part of "make cycle" any more), the newly created > > ppc386.exe is used for compilation of RTL, FCL, > > FV, packages and IDE. > > > So you mean that the newly created compiler is giving the error?
Specifically, with ppc1.exe (which is 2.1.1 compiler already if working with 2.1.1 sources) - you should be able to see this in the log/make output. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
