On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 08:17, Micha Nelissen wrote: > > Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > > > Well, I just added some stuff there, yesterday. It's far from being > > > complete yet (it just covers a basic "parallel" construct), nor is > > > it really thought through yet, but well, it might be a start; > > > something to begin with. > > > > > > Any suggestions are welcome, of course. > > > > Does parallel mean all the statements in the block can be executed in > > parallel, or that multiple copies of the block of statements can be > > started in parallel ? > > The latter. Which is why I think that it's better to have them as local functions, instead of having to introduce a lot of new functions. Local functions are very pascal-ish. C doesn't have it, which is why they can't use it. Let's use the language features to their full extent. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
