Marco van de Voort wrote: >> Marco van de Voort wrote: . . >> However, it certainly depends on whether a general solution (not >> requiring special support like DV, etc.) is really feasible and >> practical. > > I doubt it. Note that it also probably needs enhancing of the > threadinterface with a giveuptimeslice functionality, something for which > now sleep(0) is abused.
Let's add it then? I believe such a call belongs to system unit anyway, even without multithreading... SysUtils.Sleep can then call such function explicitely for platforms not ensuring giving up timeslice as part of the usual sleep functionality, Drivers.GiveUpTimeslice (from FV) should use the same call. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
