Pianoman wrote: > Hi, I am interested whether is planed implementation of SSE3 floating > instruction in to FPC. I saw optimizations in gpc for p2 p3 how can I > set FPC to optimize let's say for P4?
FPC supports sse and sse2. sse3 gives no real advantage for a compiler. > Regards > Pianoman > ----- Original Message ----- From: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:00 PM > Subject: fpc-pascal Digest, Vol 21, Issue 19 > > >> Send fpc-pascal mailing list submissions to >> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of fpc-pascal digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. writing to dynamic array via formal parameter; what is the >> right way (???? ???????????) >> 2. [OT] fpc-gtk2 application on arm (Koenraad Lelong) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:20:10 +0400 >> From: ???? ??????????? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [fpc-pascal] writing to dynamic array via formal parameter; >> what is the right way >> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r >> >> I use something like >> >> var a: array of byte; >> setlength(a,TheSize); >> blockwrite(afile,a[0],TheSize); >> >> Of course, if it is possible that TheSize=0, I have to write "if >> TheSize>0 then blockwrite(...);" >> >> Is this the intended way? (Ok, that's not a big overhead, but it seems >> strange to me.) >> >> What is the intended way (if it's somewhat different)? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 20:38:25 +0200 >> From: Koenraad Lelong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [fpc-pascal] [OT] fpc-gtk2 application on arm >> To: FPC-Pascal users discussions <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Hi, >> I think it's off-topic, but since I don't know where to look I take a >> chance asking here in the hope that some GTK-gurus can help me further. >> I'm making a gtk2 application. Since it has to run on an arm-box with a >> 320x240 screen I made a main form of that size (actually 320x220 because >> the title bar). This displays fine, full screen. On that form I have a >> button to show a modal form, defined with the same size. When I display >> this modal form on my i386-PC I get what I expected : a window of the >> same size as the main window. When I display this on my arm-box it's >> smaller and some buttons are clipped away. >> I would like to understand why this happens. I could trim the form by >> trail and error to fit it in the place I get, but this is not good >> enough. >> I don't know how I could google for this, if it's possible. I looked >> around on the gtk.org site without luck. >> Is there anyone who can point me in the right direction ? >> Regards, >> Koenraad Lelong. >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >> >> End of fpc-pascal Digest, Vol 21, Issue 19 >> ****************************************** >> > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
