Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 19 dec 2005, at 10:47, Adrian Veith wrote: > >> Test1 isn't relevant anymore. And in Test2 and Test3 fpc beats delphi >> clearly. The benefits for the FastMM4 are now not that big anymore, >> but it helps to compare delphi and fpc on a fair base, since the >> impact of the MM is now leveled out. > > > But currently all these optimization have come at the cost of various > new bugs in the ansistring handling (and possibly also in the heap > manager), so don't use the current 2.1.1 for production work at this > time. According to someone else's tests, svn revision 1948 is safe > revision 1966 and onwards isn't (I don't think he tested 1949-1965, but > 1949 is the one with the first optimizations).
I think it's the decr ref. problem, however, it shouldn't have an impact on speed to fix this. I'll look at it tonight. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
