> L wrote: > > Why is the first and third example *so* much faster than the second example? > > Significantly faster. > > > > Because you doubled the number of string concatenations. > > Vincent.
Right, but it's not twice as slow :-) Worse... It's at least 50-100 times slower. Weird. I will have to do some bench marks. I just thought that if there was already a string concatenation happening, that an additional concatenation would cost me twice as much time, but not 50-100 times. Plus, the second concatenation is a small concatenation. It's only two characters in length (#13#10) whereas the Line is much bigger. -- L505 _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
