Quoting Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Interfaces are part of 2.0 but mainly to be dephi compatible. > >> > > > > > > You mean that 20% of functionality of delphi interfaces that you currently > support? > > Well, those 20% cover 80% of interface usage. The most important where > interfaces are used is COM importing and that works usually ;) >
And you do that on linux, how???? Being cross portable and all. Interfaces are usable for many other things and COM being not cross portable solution is not one of them. If I remember you denied quite a few times interfaces that are not equal on all platforms. Where is COM different here? Meaning 80% usage on Windows and 20% on any other system. Sorry if I don't use or code for or maintain windows machines. > > > > So delphi supports operators? and few other objfpc things? > > No, but those are ancient. The problem is with extensions that they must be > maintained as every feature because they get broken from time to time. This > is Ancient, ahhh I see, D9 implemented foreach in classic mode, but you're against that too? > simply experience or just follow up the online testsuite results. Though > everybody is careful with its patches, test results get worse if nothing is > done. So we're careful with adding new features. > Feature, bugs are now features???? As I recall I reported at least 3 bugs. As you probably forget. The first time it was mentioned that you're busy preparing for 2.0 (bugs only, but still I wonder why my reports of wrong happening with refcount were not treated so) and not introducing new features I agreed and even suggest that I move off (I didn't wanted to bother you) and contribute just 100% done things that you can test (for next version, and wheter is to your likes) if they suit you. Up 'till now my only intention was to develop few features, try not to break anything and possibly do it in a way that you could integrate it as easy as possible if you'd like it. The answer from Michael Van Canneyt changed my intention, I just want to develop it goodbye ml > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through Horde-Toaster (http://qmailtoaster.clikka.com/) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
