Peter J. Haas wrote: > Hi Peter, > > on 2005-03-25T19:37:02+02:00 Peter wrote: > >>>I know. But why I should explain it more detailed, if you anyway >>>disapprove such suggestions. :-( > > >>Most ppl want compatibility with Delphi. When we add a warning for >>uninitialized var parameters then there will be a lot of bug reports >>that Delphi doesn't warn in those cases and we will have to reject >>the bug report and explain it everytime. > > > Why do you annoy me?
Usually such a comment is enough for a filter to trash ... > Mabe you don't know it, but both hints are never generated by the > Delphi compiler. Beside that all three problems and certainly few more > could be solved with one common solution, which I have described > already. But why anybody should have any interest to develop a > solution, if he read statements like: "Sending a patch to implement > the missing feature that you want will increase the chance that it'll > be added to FPC." So? Currently the chances might be zero, if somebody provides a good patch chance might be one. I call this an increase. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
