In a message dated 3/1/2005 5:00:35 A.M. Central Standard Time,
 Agustin Barto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I ran some test of several Extended matrix internal representations
to implement on an adaptation of Jedi_Math's matrix code (already
contributed some of this modifications). In the attached file you'll
see one of these tests. I have some questions about the results:

* The performance of the three internal structures is virtually the
same. Which one do you think is the best?
* The program compiled with fpc 1.9.8 (on Linux) is two times slower
than the one compiled with Delphi 7 (on Windows). Do you know what can
I do to improve the performance with fpc?
This would seem to be very interesting to explore, but being that it is related to
FPC 1.9.8 (which is still "release-candidate" i.e.. RC 2), it probably would get more attention if you posted it to the fpc-devel list rather than here.
 
Secondarily, I would suggest that comparing the performance of fpc on Linux to Delphi on Windows is somewhat like comparing the performance of a bicycle to that of a train. Way too many variables involved. 
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to