Anyone ever use this unit?  Just wondering if it works better....

http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at/~knapp/graphix_old/gxhome.html

Jeff

On Aug 4, 2004, at 8:12 AM, John Coppens wrote:

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:35:14 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 3 aug 2004, at 06:34, John Coppens wrote:

I more or less gave up on using graph - it's a bit of a headache to
have
the video switch modes, particularly while debugging. I don't know if
there is a more elegant solution, apart from trying to open a new
window
with a gnome-canvas in it or so.

The best solution would be an SDL-based graph unit, I think. Nobody's working on that though, afaik.


Jonas

Hi Jonas.

I did a 'client-server' type of thing. On the Pascal-side it looks like a
Graph-compatible library. But instead of switching modes, it starts a new
window, with a gnome-canvas in it. The 'graph' lib then sends its graphic
commands through a pipe to the new window.


It is far from usable (many things are missing) but the idea has several
pluses (in my opinion):


1) The 'remote graph' can be called from other programs as the interface
is just the pipe. I could even be called from bash... (never tried)


2) The gnome canvas has nice anti-aliased graphics, and the resulting
plots _do_ look very nice.

As I said, it is far from complete (eg. no fonts yet) and not very stable
either. One thing I haven't found yet is a way to save the gnome-canvas to
a graphics file (I just made screen shots).


With the experience I had later with gnome-print library, I could image
that this could also be combined somehow.

Is there interest in this?

John
------

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to