--- Harald Houppermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a general comment:
>
> Have you thought about writing a generic/general
> linked list unit first and
> then using that to implement the widget stuff ?
>
> Since writing linked lists can be tricky... best is
> to make a generic unit
> for it... test it well... and use it ;)
>
> I can think up some reasons why not to use generic
> linked lists:
>
> 1. Speed reasons. ( Generic lists might be a bit
> slower because of more
> procedure calling )
>
> 2. Some special linked list stuff is required..
>
> Do any of these reasons apply ?
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.
No, there is no reason to not write a generic linked
list first. I've considered working on a generic
linked list class as a separate project from the one
I'm currently working on. First I would like to see
this project through to completion before I start a
generic list.
Ron_W
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
