I get it. I just thought given limited resources (time being one of the precious one) an individual working on the compiler could do a better job if they focused on one or two popular platforms and make FPC really shine. But I guess I don't know enogh about the process to make this comment.
FPC developement is done by it's community and everybody is free to do what he wants as long as it's "compatible" with the other work done on FPC. So even if somebody wants to do a C64 cross compiler we won't stop him ;)
But this sort of thing is common accross most open source projects. People work on what interests them and that is fair enough. What interests one may be useless to a lot others. To me FPC on Linux and Windows (and perhaps Solaris) is all I care about.
More usefull / well tested libraries on those platforms would be great. Unfortunately you don't get the libraries tested unless there is a sizable number of users of the library.Chicken and egg problem sort of.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
